8 Interesting Reasons the Obama Era May Be the Third Reconstruction Period

President Barack Obama’s election marks the beginning of the Third Reconstruction.

In an interview conducted by Annabel Park and Eric Byler of Story of America, the Rev. William Barber, president of the North Carolina NAACP, described the three different eras of Reconstruction. The first was the 1860s era following the Civil War that the history books acknowledge. He explains that the second era of Reconstruction occurred during the 1960s. The Black people of this era saw advances, such as the March on Washington and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as setbacks, such as the deaths of Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X and Medgar Evers. Barber concluded by saying that the election of Obama “represented the possibility of a third Reconstruction” due to his utilization of fusion politics.

 

via whitehouse.gov

via whitehouse.gov

The use of fusion politics characterizes the Era of Obama.

Fusion politics is demonstrated by a coalition of different political parties working together; this is often referred to as “electoral fusion.” Barber has conveyed that negative political consequences always come about after the use of fusion politics. This was evident during Reconstruction, and this is evident today. Barber went on to state that the political consequences take on the form of legislative attacks on taxes, education, labor, criminal justice and voting rights in order to bring an end to the use of fusion politics and Black political success.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top