7 Terms You Should Steer Clear Of When Discussing Racism

Atop a growing heap of Black corpses, Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, FBI Director James Comey and a teeming hoard of white people proclaim the need for a chitchat on racism. Never mind that we’ve been discussing white violation of Black people since Olaudah Equiano and Harriet Jacobs or that these talks have not convinced white people to permanently divest from the enterprise of white supremacy. These chinwags are designed to be impotent because the exchanged words rarely reveal truth about what racism is and how it works. A Chinese proverb says: The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name. Words are tools, weapons. People must re-examine the way we articulate the value of Black life and the machinations of white terrorism. Too many terms deliberately obscure and confound an accurate understanding of racism. Our vocabularies require a spring cleaning. Take these seven phrases to the dump.

racism crying

“Crying Racism”
There’s a lengthy record of white paternalism that justifies white tyranny by equating the global Black collective with unruly, ungrateful, undisciplined children in need of white guardians. Former President Richard Nixon, Hollywood icon John Wayne and literary giant Rudyard Kipling all concluded and promoted that “The White Man’s Burden” was to rule the immature coloreds of the earth. The phrase “crying racism” is the evolution of this racist doctrine. When Black people correctly charge, accuse or indict whites for centuries of terrorism, we’re compared to whimpering infants throwing a tantrum. It’s expected that racists will employ this term to further discount Black voices. We should permanently expunge this term.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top