7 Terms You Should Steer Clear Of When Discussing Racism

racism 2

“Progress”
Following the non-indictments of the killers of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, President Barack Obama told BET’s Jeff Johnson that, “We can’t equate what is happening now to what was happening 50 years ago. … We have made progress.” For once, a chorus of white people agree with Obama and cite his temporary residence in the White House as proof.

Fifty years after his assassination, Malcolm X’s analysis remains prescient: “If you stick a knife nine inches into my back and pull it out three inches, that is not progress. Even if you pull it all the way out, that is not progress. Progress is healing the wound, and America hasn’t even begun to pull out the knife.”

To the contrary, Black people continue to be stabbed.

The Pew Research Center recently reported that the median net worth for white households is 13 times than that of Black households. As opposed to progress, it’s getting worse. The New Republic’s Dean Starkman writes, “The bulk of the black-white wealth gap can be traced to current policies and structures that have made the wealth divide grow at an accelerating pace over the past 25 years.” Use of the term “progress” when addressing racism implies that congratulations are in order for a job well done on a task nearly completed. It belies the unabated continuum of deliberate Black desecration.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top