Stanford Researchers Unveil Racial Stereotypes That Lead Teachers to Discipline Black Students More Severely

Prof. Jennifer Eberhardt

Prof. Jennifer Eberhardt

The reasons behind the vast racial disparities in student discipline have plagued educators for years, but researchers from Stanford figured out how to design a study that laid bare the basic racism and racial stereotyping that controls the thoughts and behaviors of many white teachers.

The Stanford researchers, psychology professor Jennifer Eberhardt and Stanford psychology graduate student Jason Okonofua, were motivated by data showing that Black students in the U.S. were over three times more likely than white students to be suspended or expelled.

So they came up with a clever design that would demonstrate how teachers respond to Black students. The results were published in the journal Psychological Science in a study called “Two Strikes: Race and the Disciplining of Young Students.”

The researchers presented primary and high school teachers with school records describing two instances of misbehavior by a student. In the first study, the teachers were then asked questions about each infraction: how bad it was, how irritated it would make them feel, how severely the student should be punished, whether they viewed the student as a troublemaker.

In the second study, the teachers were asked whether they thought the misbehavior was part of a pattern and whether they could imagine themselves suspending the student in the future.

But here’s the catch: the researchers gave some of the students hypothetical names that sounded Black (such as DeShawn or Darnell) and others got names that sounded white (such as Greg or Jake).

It was after the second infraction that the researchers found that racial stereotypes went to work. Teachers were more troubled by a second infraction if they were led to believe it was committed by a Black student than if they thought it was committed by a white student.

They were more likely to see the Black students as troublemakers, more likely to want to discipline them more harshly, more likely to see the misbehavior as part of a pattern, and more likely to imagine themselves suspending that student in the future.

“We see that stereotypes not only can be used to allow people to interpret a specific behavior in isolation, but also stereotypes can heighten our sensitivity to behavioral patterns across time. This pattern sensitivity is especially relevant in the schooling context,” said Eberhardt, a 2014 recipient of the prestigious $625,000 MacArthur “genius” grant for her probing work on race.

Okonofua said he could easily see the implications of the findings beyond a school setting.

“Most social relationships entail repeated encounters,” he said. “Interactions between police officers and civilians, between employers and employees, between prison guards and prisoners all may be subject to the sort of stereotype escalation effect we have identified in our research.”

The researchers suggested it would be enormously helpful to hold interventions with teachers to show them that they needed to view student behavior as malleable, rather than as a permanent state, such as labeling a student a “troublemaker.”

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top