7 Distinct Ways Ancient African Women Were Better Off Than Roman Women

780389ec64288932509369778a7fd678

Power Structure

In ancient Rome, women were excluded from publicly recognized offices. Although they increasingly obtained social freedom and a considerable measure of independence under private law, their status in public law remained severely restricted. Nevertheless, indirectly they played an important and often decisive role in the course of Rome’s political history. In Africa, the fact that there had been women in power in traditional societies is mostly neglected in mainstream historical appraisals of the position of women on the continent. Although normally administration and decision-making were in the hands of men, there are ample examples of women in power. These were not only female rulers, but women of royal lineage, female maternal relatives or sisters of the chief.

 

 

Uwezo-Laikipia-KALAN-61

Rights vs. Wrongs

Roman women could not vote, hold office or have their own names. Roman law particularly aimed to uphold the privileges and property of the family, not the individual. Birth rights, marriage, divorce, children, inheritance — the Romans devised intricate rules to manage them, according to historytravelswithnancy.com. Conversely, in Africa, women could manage, own and sell private property, land, portable goods, servants, livestock and money. Women could resolve legal settlements and could conclude any kind of legal settlement. African women could appear as a contracting partner in a marriage contract or a divorce contract; they could execute testaments; women could make adoptions. This amount of freedom was at variance from other women in much of the world, according to a Cornell University research.

Subscribe To The ABS Newsletter — Get our stories in your inbox.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Latest from Atlanta Black Star

Back to top