8 Brands That Have Notoriously Been Accused Of Racism

Kayla Phillips Barneys
Barneys New York

Brooklyn nursing student Kayla Phillips used her tax refund money to purchase a $2,500 Céline bag at the high-end New York retail store in February 2013, which would usually be considered a good thing by most outlets. But Phillips (above) was stopped and detained by four undercover officers who followed her to the subway station. She sued the Madison Avenue store, sparking a backlash that saw 59,000 people sign a change.org petition against Barneys, and protesters asked rap mogul Jay Z to end a partnership he had with the store. Barneys paid $525,000 in fees and penalties after New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s investigation found that the store routinely followed Black shoppers, door guards pinged African-Americans as worthy of video surveillance, and some sales associates ignored Black clients, among other indiscretions. Rapper Wiz Khalifa, despite spending $16,000 in the store, experienced this treatment, as he was followed by security in Barneys in 2011.

 

abercrombie_fitch_logo
Abercrombie and Fitch

The store was ordered to pay $50 million to Black, Latino, Asian-American and female applicants who had accused the company of discrimination in hiring and had issues with how they were treated as employees. The settlement required the retail store to enforce policies that promoted diversity in its workforce and to prevent future discrimination based on race or gender. Beyond that, the store, in 2005, sold sexist women’s T-shirts that read: “Who needs a brain when you have these?” Additionally, stores reportedly allowed white employees to work the front house while Asians, African-Americans and people with prosthetics worked in the back, away from customers. There have been numerous lawsuits against the brand for religious discrimination and discrimination against disabled customers.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top