9 Ways Black People Seriously Fought Back During the Civil Rights Era

m-4170The notion that the Civil Rights Movement in the South was strictly a nonviolent movement remains a dominant theme and a misrepresentation of history. In countless Southern communities, Black people picked up arms, organized, intimidated and met force with force to defend their leaders, communities and lives. In particular, Black people relied on armed self-defense in communities where federal government officials failed to protect them from the violence of racists and segregationists who were often supported by local law enforcement. Here are some of the many instances of how they fought back.

 

Negroes-with-guns-1200x545_c

‘Armed Resistance’

Charles E. Cobb explains in his book, “This Nonviolent Stuff’ll Get You Killed: How Guns Made the Civil Rights Movement Possible,” that Black people may have had a nonviolence approach to the racist attacks of whites during the Civil Rights Movement, but they were not against defending themselves, either. Armed self-defense (or “armed resistance”) as part of the Black struggle began not in the 1960s with angry “militant” and “radical” young African-Americans, but in the earliest years of the United States as one of African people’s responses to oppression, according to the book. “In every decade of the nation’s history, brave and determined Black men and women picked up guns to defend themselves and their communities.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top