10 Ways Dr. Charles Drew’s Contributions to Blood Storage Forever Changed The World

blood for britain

Drew to the Rescue in World War II

Although Drew didn’t “discover” plasma as a blood substitute, his expertise and leadership were largely responsible for the program’s success, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine. When it concluded in January 1941, Blood for Britain had collected 14,556 blood donations, and shipped (via the Red Cross) over 5,000 liters of plasma saline solution to England. Drew’s final report on the project established him as a leading expert on blood procurement and processing. In-house Red Cross history noted that Drew’s report “had brought together, for the benefit of hematologists working everywhere, the latest knowledge acquired by scientists working in several different fields.” It was a remarkable synthesis of research studies (both commercial and academic), clinical tests, and the practical experience gained from blood bank operations here and abroad.

 

 

charlesdrew907

The Importance of Plasma Donation

In contrast to whole blood donation, plasma donation may be done much more often (three times per week in some jurisdictions, compared to once per eight weeks for whole blood donation), because the whole blood cells are returned to the body during the donation process, according to the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Most plasma is naturally replaced by the body within 48 hours. In some jurisdictions, and in contrast to whole blood donation, plasma donors may be compensated financially ($10–$100 per week for three to seven hours of time, normally). It is usually defined as a compensation for time and trouble rather than a “purchase” or “sale” of a body part, for various legal, ethical and cultural reasons.

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top