5 Former NBA Players Who Were Never The Same After an ACL Injury

The most consistently devastating injury in sports is the torn ACL (anterior cruciate ligaments) in the knee. In most cases, players take close to a year to return to action. Jabari Parker, the No. 2 pick in the June NBA Draft of the Milwaukee Bucks, suffered the debilitating injury last week. How he comes back from it is a mystery. Some like Kyle Lowery of the Toronto Raptors returned from it and have flourished. Others just are not the same. Here are five who lost a step or two, turning potentially all-time careers into something slightly or significantly less.

New York Knicks vs. Boston CelticsBernard King

Before he sustained his knee injury on March 23, 1985, Bernard King was among the most lethal small forwards in the game with the New York Knicks. He was averaging 32.9 points a game at the time. His devastatingly quick release, superb mid-range game, skillful post-up moves and ability to finish the fast break made him a feared player. In 1984 “Bernard was the No. 1 player I hated to play against,” Hall of Famer Dominique Wilkins said. How awesome was King? He was the first player in NBA history to score 50 points on back-to-back nights. He had 50 against San Antonio and then 50 on the Dallas Mavericks the next night—both games on the road. Repairing the ACL was a mystery at the time King got hurt, so it took him two years of private rehab to return. He never got to play with Patrick Ewing. He was released and joined the Washington Bullets (now the Wizards) in 1987 and made the all-star team in 1991. Before the injury, King averaged 25.2 in the previous five years. In the five years after the injury, he averaged 22.8, which is nothing to dismiss. But he was less explosive and more cunning.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top