Computer Hacker Group Responds to KKK Threat in Ferguson by Shutting Down KKK Websites

1416224677836938After causing major disruption to law enforcement in Ferguson during the summer protests over the killing of Michael Brown, the collective of hackers known as Anonymous has set its sights on the KKK after the hate group last week threatened Ferguson protesters with violence.

Calling the campaign OpKKK, the hacktivists have already disrupted KKK websites and publicly released personal information on KKK members, according to the techy website Motherboard.com.

Anonymous released a video on YouTube saying that while it respected the KKK’s right to free speech, the hate group had overstepped the mark by threatening physical violence.

Last week, the Missouri chapter of the infamous terrorist organization put out fliers to warn the public that they “will use lethal force as provided under Missouri Law to defend ourselves.”

The leader of the Missouri chapter, Frank Ancona, spoke to MSNBC host Chris Hayes on Wednesday to explain why the KKK distributed the warning fliers.

“Actually it’s addressing the people who are making these terroristic threats and letting them know that the people of Missouri have rights too,” Ancona said.

Ancona believes that his warning fliers addressed to “the terrorists masquerading as ‘peaceful protestors’,” is making the situation better in Ferguson.

Motherboard said Anonymous had “hit a range of KKK websites over the weekend through to today, including kkk.com, unskkkk.com and traditionalistamericanknights.com, with Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. Those sites were intermittently down today. At least two Twitter accounts have also been compromised: @KluKluxKlanUSA and @YourKKKCentral.”

Motherboard also indicated that OpKKK appears to be working alongside OpFerguson, the group that caused major disruptions in Ferguson after Brown’s death. After claiming that it had broken into Ferguson’s municipal computer system, Anonymous released details about city workers and posted photos of Jon Belmar, the chief of the St. Louis County Police Department, in addition to pictures of his wife, son and daughter and his home address and telephone number.

Anonymous warned police not to overreact to rallies and protests. Anonymous also released the dispatcher’s tape showing that the officer who shot Brown never called for police backup or for EMS response. Anonymous threatened to release video showing officers throwing Brown’s body into the back of a vehicle—after the body allegedly was lying in the street for hours. Before the release of the name of Officer Darren Wilson as the shooter of Brown, Anonymous threatened to release his name—but then released the wrong name, taking major flack for the error.

OpKKK said it would release personal information on Klan members over the next 24 hours unless the Klan stopped threatening physical force against protesters. The OpKKK Twitter user said the attacks would stop “when the people of Ferguson receive freedom and are able to protest peacefully without threats or being harmed by organisations such as the KKK.”

The grand jury verdict on whether to charge Wilson in the shooting of Brown is expected this week.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top