Kobe Bryant Says He Will Stay a Laker, Even Though Knicks Would Be A Great Move

A nugget that was unconfirmed and, apparently, had little merit, was juicy nonetheless: a Kobe Bryant trade to the New York Knicks.

The Los Angeles Lakers have lost all four games this season, with Bryant showing his one-of-a-kind skill that has made him a future Hall of Famer—even at 36 and coming off two major injuries. A report surmised that the Knicks would deal for Bryant: Amari Stoudemire, Tim Hardaway Jr. and others for the five-time champion. The move would reunite Bryant with longtime teammate Derrick Fisher, who is in his first year as coach, and Phil Jackson, the Knicks’ president.

Bryant is having none of it. He told Yahoo Sports: “I hear the chatter of Kobe should ask out and he should go and play for a contender in this latter stage of his career,” Bryant said. “But that’s not what I do. I’m extremely loyal to the Lakers.”

Loyal, maybe. But in 2007 Bryant, frustrated that management was not doing enough to build a strong base of support, demanded a trade from the Lakers. They won two more championships since then and he has redoubled his commitment to the franchise.

“I bleed purple and gold,” he said.

Imagine, for fun, Bryant playing his last two years in New York, at Madison Square Garden, where a few years ago he dropped 61 in an epic performance. He’d be center stage on the game’s biggest platform for excellence, in front of rabid fans who’d cherish the opportunity to witness his brilliance from up close. He’d have Carmelo Anthony to relieve some of the scoring burden that could wear him down in L.A. J.R. Smith could give him relief, too, and the change to the East would give Bryant a realistic chance to be competitive in his final years—something that just does not appear on the horizon in Los Angeles.

In the Eastern Conference, the Knicks with Bryant could challenge perceived frontrunners Chicago and Cleveland. But Bryant and Anthony would be a lethal duo that could—with the country’s largest city and fan base supporting it—make some big playoff noise.

Meanwhile, the Lakers could unload Stoudamire’s huge contract that expires after this season and have significant room to begin a massive rebuilding that cannot truly take place until Bryant retires. A win/win situation.

The reality, at least for now, is that Bryant will labor with the under-talented Lakers. He will show a lot of his remarkable gifts, score big on most nights (as long as he avoids injury) and generally function as the “Black Mamba”—only with few victories to show for his effort.

Still, trading Bryant would amount to an uprising in L.A. He is, deservedly so, an iconic figure, beloved perhaps more than any Laker in the storied history of the franchise. Trading him, no matter what it does for the future of the franchise, would be considered catastrophic among Laker nation.

Still, there will come a point when the losing eats at Bryant too much. He’s too smart to alienate his enormous fan base by demanding a trade. But maybe he would not refute one if it were presented to him. Kobe Bryant playing in New York for the Knicks would enhance the NBA season ten-fold. It probably won’t happen.

But we can dream.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top