After Garner’s Death Declared a Homicide, NYPD Leaders Call Ruling ‘Political,’ Threaten Job Slowdown

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is coming under increased pressure from the New York Police Department, as the head of the police officers’ union, Patrick Lynch, blasted the medical examiner’s ruling that Eric Garner’s death was a homicide caused by a chokehold, calling it “political.”

Meanwhile, Sergeants Benevolent Association President Ed Mullins made a thinly veiled threat that his members might slow their response times because of the city’s response to the Garner case.

“This is not a chokehold; a chokehold is a completely opposite tactic,” Mullins said Tuesday. Though the NYPD banned chokeholds 20 years ago, officers continue to use them.

Then Mullins addressed his members in what sounded like a threat of a slowdown: “We want you to do your job. We want you to follow the rule book the way it’s written. And if there’s a delay in getting to the next place, so be it.”

But de Blasio seemed unfazed by the threat.

“I’ve long since learned to listen respectfully to the words of union leaders,” the mayor said at a news conference Tuesday. “What I’m concerned about are the everyday folks who are there to do their jobs. If some union leaders want to speak out, I’ve heard plenty from union leaders over the years. But the rank and file are here to do their job and they will do their job.”

While early stories had suggested that Garner died at the hospital of a heart attack and police supporters claimed that his weight was the main reason for his death, the medical examiner’s office was clear, finding “compression of neck (chokehold), compression of chest, and prone positioning during physical restraint by police” killed Garner — though the office did add that Garner’s obesity, diabetes, sleep apnea and asthma were contributing conditions to his death.

In ruling that the manner of death was homicide, the medical examiner is not offering any conclusions about whether Officer Daniel Pantaleo committed a crime when he put the 43-year-old Garner in a chokehold. The office is merely stating that Garner died at the hands of another person or persons.

“I’ve never seen a document that was more political than that press release released by the ME’s office,” Lynch said, telling reporters that Garner had been warned by officers the week before his death to stop selling loose cigarettes — though witnesses claimed Garner had not been selling cigarettes when the cops began to harass him.

Lynch, president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, said race did not play any role in the confrontation, as many have alleged, including the Rev. Al Sharpton.

“It is a person’s behavior that leads to interactions with police, not who they are, what they look like or how much money they have in their pocket,” Lynch said.

After Lynch said Pantaleo had not used a chokehold on Garner, despite the video evidence, de Blasio defended the city medical examiner’s office. He said the city’s medical examiner’s office is the “gold standard in this country.”

Both de Blasio and Police Commissioner Bill Bratton have said it appears a chokehold was used.

In a related development, Richard Emery, the new chairman of the Civilian Complaint Review Board, the police watchdog agency, said the board will re-examine all complaints of illegal chokeholds used by police officers over the past five years. He said there were about 1,000 complaints about chokeholds in that period, and 608 were not investigated.

“We hope we can better advise the police department to enforce the patrol guide standard,” he said.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top