Racist Dress Code in Minneapolis Bar Slammed as ‘New Jim Crow’

Bar Louie enforces racist dress code Bar Louie, a sports bar in Minneapolis, has been accused of racial profiling after they implemented a new dress code that seems to be aimed at fashion trends that have become widely popular in the African-American community.

Flat-billed hats, athletic apparel, sleeveless undershirts and large chains are only a few of the fashion trends that have become increasingly trendy in the Black community thanks to hip-hop culture.

These are also the latest dress code violations at Bar Louie.

Citizens in the area have slammed the dress code as “the new Jim Crow” and “systematic oppression” of Blacks.

A new sign that has been posted outside the bar warns would-be patrons that there are some new regulations about what they can wear inside the sports bar.

The sign lists the following dress code violations:

• Flat-billed hats

• Large chains

• Sleeveless under shirts

• Long white T-shirts

• Athletic apparel

• Sports jerseys without collars

• Excessively baggy clothing

In addition to specifically addressing clothing from the hip-hop culture, the strict dress code is quite odd considering the venue is a sports bar.

The bar’s manager, however, says local management had nothing to do with it.

Instead the manager insisted that the corporate office handed down the dress code.

The same corporate office allegedly instructed another Bar Louie franchise in Tennessee to change their dress code regulations as well, to make sure all patrons had their hats facing forward.

Sports bar enforces racist dress code “You might as well say, ‘No Black folks allowed,’ “ said Michelle Horovitz, who called Fox 9 when she saw the sign outside the bar. “It’s ridiculous.”

Horovitz added that the establishment might as well put a sign on the door that says they don’t want African-American customers instead of trying to “break it down to the dress code.”

“If they don’t want us here, then we don’t have to be there – and that’s their loss,” she said.

As it turns out, the bar already received pretty poor reviews on social media anyway. Offending such a large demographic with an overtly racist dress code was the last thing Bar Louie needed.

Either way, Horovitz felt that the problem was even bigger than just one bar – it’s a statewide issue.

“Minnesota might be the nicest, healthiest, cleanest state in America, but we have huge issues as far as segregation, racism, systematic oppression – and people want to look the other way,” she told Fox 9. “This is not OK, and we’re not going to patronize you if you don’t change your policy.”

 

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top