Romney Blames Obama, Clinton for Situation in Crimea

Former presidential candidate Mitt Romney has arisen from the ashes again to attack President Obama, this time in a Wall Street Journal op-ed in which he manages to blame Obama and Hillary Clinton for the situation in Ukraine and other foreign policy issues.

Romney, who was thoroughly trounced in the 2012 election partly because of a series of foreign policy gaffes, joined a chorus of other conservatives who have pointed a finger at Obama for letting Putin get away with annexing a country that used to be a part of Russia, as if he could have changed the course of events in Ukraine if he had walked with more of a Putin-like swagger.

Romney wrote that the fact that there are “no good options” for the U.S. everywhere “from Crimea to North Korea, from Syria to Egypt, and from Iraq to Afghanistan” is due to negligence on Obama’s part — leaving us only to “wring our hands.”

“A large part of the answer is our leader’s terrible timing. In virtually every foreign-affairs crisis we have faced these past five years, there was a point when America had good choices and good options,” Romney wrote. “There was a juncture when America had the potential to influence events. But we failed to act at the propitious point; that moment having passed, we were left without acceptable options.”

Romney even issued a warning to current Secretary of State John Kerry.

“President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton traveled the world in pursuit of their promise to reset relations and to build friendships across the globe,” Romney said. “Their failure has been painfully evident: It is hard to name even a single country that has more respect and admiration for America today than when President Obama took office, and now Russia is in Ukraine. Part of their failure, I submit, is due to their failure to act when action was possible, and needed. A chastened president and Secretary of State Kerry, a year into his job, can yet succeed, and for the country’s sake, must succeed. Timing is of the essence.”

Clearly the inclusion of Clinton was designed to take pre-emptive shots at the frontrunner for the 2016 presidential elections.

In Ukraine, Romney said Obama should have acted sooner.

“When protests in Ukraine grew and violence ensued, it was surely evident to people in the intelligence community — and to the White House — that President Putin might try to take advantage of the situation to capture Crimea, or more,” he wrote. “That was the time to talk with our global allies about punishments and sanctions, to secure their solidarity, and to communicate these to the Russian president.”“

In response to Romney’s editorial, former National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said on Twitter, “Lots of blaming America for the world’s problems. Zero ideas for how to solve them. Typical.”

White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer responded to Vietor’s tweet: “Safe to assume this isn’t a 2 part piece where all the solutions come next?”

When journalist Mark Halperin said perhaps Romney was saying there were solutions previously, and that Obama needed better timing, Pfeiffer tweeted: “Interesting choice to go the entire 2012 campaign without laying ANY of them out. This op ed is as vacuous as the 12 platform.”

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top