Say What? ‘I’d Never Recruit A White QB,’ Says Barry Switzer

Barry-Switzer-Johnny-Manziel

In what probably no one has heard before, former Oklahoma and Dallas Cowboys coach Barry Switzer, in criticizing Texas A&M’s Johnny Manziel, said “I’d never recruit a white quarterback.”

On WNSR radio in Nashville, Switzer’s discussion of Manziel evolved into an explanation of his recruiting tactics in college football.

The original question was intended to put Switzer in the shoes of an NFL coach with the option of selecting  Manziel in the upcoming NFL Draft.  That’s when Switzer said the words no one else has ever uttered.

“I love his ability; Johnny can play,” Switzer said. “I’ve always said I’d never recruit a white quarterback. The only way I’d ever recruit a white quarterback to play for me was if his mom and daddy would have to both be Black, and that’s the only way I would do it.”

Really?

“My offense is a quarterback-fullback offense,” Switzer continued. “I’d have to have a Jamelle Holieway, J.C. Watts [or] Thomas Lott. Those guys are gonna be my quarterbacks, they’re great runners, they’re great ball carriers and … able to pass, complete some, and those guys could. Those guys could throw and run.”

The strength of Manziel, who is white, is that he can run and throw in the way the QBs Switzer mentioned. But he apparently has another problem with Manziel. Switzer called the former Heisman Trophy winner an “arrogant little prick.”

Troy Aikman, a white Hall of Famer who attended Oklahoma when Switzer was coach before transferring to UCLA, responded on Twitter: “What about me? Ha.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top