NAACP Raises Concerns Over Bill to Revise Voting Rights Act

The NAACP on Thursday expressed appreciation for lawmakers’ effort to update voting rights laws, but raised “serious concerns” with provisions of the bill.

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) announced the legislation during a press conference Thursday. The bill, which aims to update a key component of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, has bipartisan support in the House and Senate.

The bill would repair a provision of the Voting Rights Act struck down by the Supreme Court last summer, would keep communities informed of local voting changes, strengthen federal courts’ hand in cases of discriminatory voting changes and tighten the leash on areas with recent voting rights violations. But the bill was designed to garner support from both sides of the aisle, and some of its compromises concern the NAACP, the nation’s oldest civil rights organization.

The NAACP said in a statement:

“The NAACP appreciates that the U.S. Congress has made a bipartisan effort to update the Voting Rights Act, however we have serious concerns about the ability of some provisions in this bill to protect ALL voters from discrimination at the polls … From the exceptions for voter ID laws to decreased preclearance coverage to increased reliance on costly litigation, there are essential revisions and amendments to this bill that must take place to ensure ALL voters have fair and equitable access to the ballot box.”

The civil rights organization was not alone in its sentiments. The Service Employees International Association, American Civil Liberties Union, Advancement Project and others released statements celebrating the legislation as a “good first step,” but saying they still had concerns.

“The bill includes commonsense updates to a law that has protected the fundamental right to vote for American citizens for nearly 50 years,” said Deborah J. Vagins, senior legislative counsel at ACLU. “While it does not fix everything that was lost in [the Supreme Court case], we are pleased to see a bipartisan bill that contains a set of protections that are flexible, forward-looking, and written to capture recent discrimination and stop discriminatory changes before elections take place. ”

Source: huffingtonpost.com

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top