Morris Chestnut Opens Up About Struggle For Roles as a Dark-Skinned Actor

Morris Chestnut the Best Man Holiday Morris Chestnut is the man of many women’s dreams, but he revealed that when he first decided to chase the big screen he was not offered a variety of roles because of his dark skin color.

“When I was coming up, it was difficult,” Chestnut explained. “When I was first starting out many, many years ago, gang genre was in. There was some type of skin issue to where they would see the darker-skinned actors for the gang members.”

He added that lighter-skinned actors were given the “good guy” roles.

While Chestnut managed to avoid getting his start through a gang member role, that didn’t mean he wasn’t put in the same box that the industry had created for darker-skinned actors.

Chestnut got his start in the classic film Boyz N the Hood, where he had the role of a football player who experienced the same tragic death as a gang member would have had.

By the end of the ‘90s, however, the tables started to turn in Chestnut’s favor, as darker-skinned actors were finally starting to break the mold that had once kept them constrained to a small pool of roles.

According to the “Best Man Holiday” actor, he has Wesley Snipes to thank for that.

“It was until, really, Wesley Snipes came and kinda just bust the mold open,” he said. “He did play the gang member in New Jack City, but when he was in Mo’ Better Blues and he was on the balcony doing his thing, women started saying, ‘Hmmm. That’s kinda sexy.’ Wesley kinda ushered it in for us.”

While progress has been made when it comes to seeing more dark-skinned actors on the big screen, there is still much more work to do.

From racism to colorism, there are still many prejudices that are holding back some talented African- American actors from landing lead roles on the big screen.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top