Marvin Lewis Rallies Bengals to Defeat Green Bay Packers

MarvinLewis

Marvin Lewis and the Cincinnati Bengals played in one of the weirdest games against the Green Bay Packers Sunday, but were still able to get the win. After a game full of turnovers and other mishaps, the ball bounced right into cornerback Terence Newman’s arms for a touchdown to seal the win.

Newman returned the fumbled gift of 58 yards for a TD which left 3:47 on the clock. That score rallied the Bengals to a 34-30 victory over Green Bay in a game of several momentum changes fueled by multiple turnovers.

“We learned some valuable lessons and survived one today that you don’t survive very often,” coach Marvin Lewis said.

Both teams coughed up the ball four times. Each team also returned a fumble for a touchdown. Besides Newman’s score, M.D. Jennings ran one back for Green Bay. Both teams also blew double digit leads. The Bengals let their 14-point advantage slip away, and the Packers blew a 16-point lead in the second half. Green Bay scored 30 consecutive points, but lost the game in the end.

“There’s been a lot of crazy games since I’ve been here,” Bengals cornerback Leon Hall said. “But that one’s up there. Top three.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top