Some Players Skeptical of Philadelphia Eagles’ Frenetic Offense

Photo by John McDonnell/The Washington Post

Coach Chip Kelly’s fast paced Philadelphia Eagles’ offense is getting a little criticism from other NFL players.

Green Bay receiver Jordy Nelson says he saw signs of wear and tear on the Eagles’ offensive players during their 33-27 win against the Washington Redskins on Monday night.

“Just watching the game from the outside, you could already see [Michael] Vick struggling, getting off the field every once in a while,” Nelson said. “The guys are a little older in the league, so they could start breaking down.

“It’s going to be a trial and error, and it will be up to their organization and coaching staff to monitor that and see what they do all week in practice to counterbalance it all.”

Nelson noted that NFL teams have fewer players and a longer season than college, indicating that it could be hard to play at that pace.

Kelly popularized his quick-tempo offense while at the University of Oregon before coaching in the NFL.

The Eagles ran 50 plays in the first half, but only finished with 77 overall.

“I’d have to see them do it for a whole game first, but they did it for the half and it was impressive,” Pittsburgh Steelers safety Ryan Clark said. “I think they have the right pieces and parts for it.”

Seattle Seahawks middle linebacker Bobby Wagner said it is impossible to keep up that pace for the entire game.

“It’s crazy,” Wagner said. “They ran 50-something plays in the first half and only 20-something in the second half. It shows you, they can’t keep that type of pace.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top