Ben Affleck Will be Batman in ‘Man Of Steel’ Sequel

Ben Affleck has been named as the man who will star as Batman in the sequel to the Superman movie Man of Steel, Warner Bros. announced Thursday.

There has been much speculation about who would play the caped crusader in the yet-to-be-named film ever since Man of Steel director Zack Snyder announced at Comic-Con last month that the two superheroes would appear together on the big screen for the first time.

Affleck will star opposite British actor Henry Cavill, who Warner Bros. said will reprise his role as Clark Kent and Superman.

Two weeks ago, The Hollywood Reporter created a list of possible actors for the  Batman role, including Ryan Gosling or Josh Brolin as the two most likely candidates.

It’s not surprising The Hollywood Reporter left Ben Affleck off the list because the actor’s past role as Marvel’s Daredevil in the 2003 film could be seen a conflict of interest.

Warner Bros. also announced Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne and Diane Lane will return for the Man of Steel sequel, which is scheduled to begin production next year and is due in theaters July 17, 2015.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top