Shots Fired: Sylvester Stallone Calls Out ‘Greedy and Lazy’ Bruce Willis in ‘Expendables 3’ Flap

Bruce Willis and Sylvester Stallone are action hero veterans and business partners, who once joined forces to cook up the Planet Hollywood  restaurant chain. Now the two former Expendables co-stars are in a stew — and boy is it heating up.

When negotiations for Willis to reprise his role as CIA agent Mr. Church in The Expendables 3 broke down, Stallone, 67, took to Twitter and announced gleefully that Willis, 58, would now not be returning.

“’WILLIS OUT… HARRISON FORD IN !!!! GREAT NEWS !!!!! Been waiting years for this!!!!,” he wrote.

Then in an effort to twist the knife and push it deeper, Stallone followed up with another tweet aimed at Willis, calling the Diehard actor “greedy” and “lazy.”

“GREEDY AND LAZY …… A SURE FORMULA FOR CAREER FAILURE,” tweeted the aging action movie star.

A spokesman for Stallone confirmed the actor had been talking about his former co-star but refused to comment further.

Willis has yet to respond, but some reports suggest that his connection with the Expendables franchise, which has raked in $574 million at the global box office, began on shaky ground.

Apparently, both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Kurt Russell turned down the role of Mr. Church before it was offered to Willis — and that didn’t go over too well with the Golden Globe-winning actor.

It’s not clear whether Ford, who stars in the forthcoming films Anchorman: The Legend Continues, Star Wars: Episode VII and Indiana Jones 5, will take over the role of Mr. Church or take on an entirely new character.

Production on The Expendables 3 is set to begin this month for a 2014 release. In addition to Ford, newcomers includes other aging action stars such as Jackie Chan, Wesley Snipes, Nicholas Cage, and Mel Gibson.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top