Zimbabweans Divided Over Election Results

Zimbabwe’s opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai is expected to go to court on Monday to challenge the election results that gave President Robert Mugabe yet another five-year term in office.The disputed results are dividing people in the country.

U.S. and U.K. concern over Zimbabwe election results

According to the BBC:

“The U.S. and U.K. have expressed concerns after Zimbabwe’s President Robert Mugabe won a seventh term in office amid claims of electoral fraud.

“’U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the results did not ‘represent a credible expression of the people. In light of substantial electoral irregularities reported by domestic and regional observers, the United States does not believe that the results represent a credible expression of the will of the Zimbabwean people,’ Mr. Kerry said.

“Western groups were not invited to send observer missions to monitor Wednesday’s election.

“The US has described the vote as ‘deeply flawed.’

“Former colonial power, the U.K., also expressed ‘grave concerns’ over reports of large numbers of voters being turned away from polling stations.

“British Foreign Minister William Hague urged a thorough investigation of all allegations of violations.

“Meanwhile the European Union, which maintains sanctions on Mr. Mugabe and his senior aides, said it was worried about ‘alleged irregularities and reports of incomplete participation’ in the election.

“Monitoring groups disagreed over the conduct of the election.”

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top