Race Matters: N-Word Beats ‘Cracker’ as Most Offensive Slur

Last night CNN aired a special called “The N Word,” which was hosted by news anchor Don Lemon. The program was broadcast in the midst of the recent allegations of racism against celebrity chef Paula Deen and the racially polarized trial of George Zimmerman.

Lemon assembled and moderated a panel tasked with debating the ramifications of the N-word in society and which derogatory term, n*gger or cracker is the most offensive. The panel included Dr. Marc Lamont Hill, actor LeVar Burton, musician Wynton Marsalis, activist Tim Wise, editor Michael Skolnik, and filmmaker Rochelle Oliver.

Hill opened up the discussion on an interesting note, addressing the perception that white people are baffled by the N-word being off-limits for their use.

“I always find it remarkable that white people find n-word usage such a complicated puzzle. It’s not that complicated: Just. Don’t. Use It,” explained Columbia professor  Hill, as simply as possible. “You just have to accept that there are some things in the world — at least one thing — that you can’t do that black people can. And that might just be okay.”

In the debate, the panelists took different positions on the use of the word amongst African-Americans, Caucasians and artists. However, they all agreed  that the “n-word” is far worse than “cracker,”  since “black and white are not the same,” and one has a deep history rooted in oppression, whereas the other derogatory phrase references white people’s position of power.

Check out the debate in the videos below:

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top