Will.i.am Sues Pharrell Williams Over the Phrase “I Am”

Will.i.am is filing a lawsuit against Pharrell Williams for his “I Am Other” brand, which Will.I.Am feels is strikingly similar to his own brand and trademark.

It seems like the leader of the Black Eyed Peas isn’t trying to play nice with the Star Trak Entertainment founder who wanted to just talk out the whole matter instead of turning it into a legal battle.

According to the official court documents that were obtained by Rolling Stone, Will.i.am thinks Pharrell’s “I Am Other” brand is “confusingly similar” to his own trademark “I AM” and he believes the “registration of the mark… is likely to dilute the I AM mark and the WILL.I.AM mark.”

If the actual logo for Pharrell’s brand resembled Will’s then he might have a case, but as it turns out the “Scream and Shout” singer is suing for the use of the words “I am.”

It is hard to believe that nobody else in the music industry will ever be able to use the two words “I am” without being sued but that will be up to a judge to decide.

For now, Williams is just disappointed that a fellow music producer wasn’t willing to just talk things out and reach a compromise without taking legal action.

“I am disappointed that Will, a fellow artist, would file a case against me,” Pharrell told the Rolling Stone. “I am someone who likes to talk things out and, in fact, I attempted to do just that on many occasions. I am surprised in how this is being handled and I am confident that Will’s trademark claims will ultimately be found to be as meritless and ridiculous as I do [sic].”

Ironically, it wasn’t long ago that Will.I.Am was on the other end of a copyright infringement lawsuit so it’s a bit surprising that he isn’t trying to settles things out of court when Pharrell said he is willing to do so.

According to Will.i.am’s lawyer, Ken Hertz, the dispute over the trademark has been going on for quite some time and apparently talking things out hasn’t been getting any results.

“Prior to lodging our objection with the US Trademark Office Will.i.am’s trademark lawyer reached out to Pharrell’s trademark lawyer in an attempt to resolve the dispute, and the parties discussed the matter for several months,” Hertz said.

Well apparently Hertz isn’t on the same page as his client because Will.I.Am just took to Twitter to deny any allegations that he’ll be taking Pharrell to court over the trademark.

“I.am not suing @Pharrell & I NEVER WAS,” he tweeted before promoting some of his charity efforts. “What i.am doing is… #iamSCHOLARSHIP sending kids to school debt free. Go2 iamANGELfoundation.org.”

He repeated the phrase once again except this time promoting a different charity.

“i.am not suing @Pharrell & I never was,” the tweed started off again. “What i.am doing is #iamHOME helping families keep their homes … see iamanglefoundation.org.”

While we commend him on his charitable efforts, one can’t help but wonder what legal documents does the Rolling Stone have and why is Will.i.am’s lawyer speaking as if they are indeed suing Pharrell over the trademark?

Something fishy is going on here…

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top