Studies Show Link Between Food and Rage

Feeling tetchy? Itching for a scrap? Maybe it’s something you ate. I have long believed in “food swings”– ply me with sweets and jam puddings and I’m a different person to my salad-eating alter ego. It’s not so much a sugar rush, like the ones that some parents of small children can testify to (and which the jury is still out on), but more of a sugar slump.

A growing body of research indicates that what we eat may also affect how angry we feel. Yet, for many, the food-mood link still has an aura of quackery. One recent University of California study showed that “greater trans fatty acids were significantly associated with greater aggression,” says lead author and professor Beatrice Golomb. “Trans fats interfere with omega 3 metabolism” – and apparently, the brain’s neurons need these essential fatty acids to keep us bright and snappy.

Lack of omega-3 has already been linked with depression and antisocial behaviour, and according to some experts, it seems many of us post-industrialists have woefully omega-3 deficient diets.

It’s not exactly “eat a sausage roll; punch someone,” but patterns of eating. Another study indicated that when levels of the brain chemical serotonin dip, from stress or not eating, it affects the brain regions regulating anger, potentially resulting in “a whirlwind of uncontrollable emotions”.

So why is the food-mood link not more widely accepted? Sketchy evidence, say some scientists. Correlation does not prove causation. For one thing, there’s a good argument that someone feeling cheesed off may be more likely to pig-out on transfat-loaded junk food in the first place.

Then there’s the contradictory flow of nutritional research, which, thanks to, “simplistic media coverage” pull us in confusing directions. Take one study that claimed to show that people who plumped for an apple instead of chocolate were more likely to be drawn to violent films. Apparently, exerting self-control led to feeling, well, a bit wound up.

This, of course, puts you in a tricky position. Succumb and eat the sugary snack laced with bad fats and you’re hopping mad; resist the urge, eat a carrot instead and you still feel angry. It’s an impossible call, and probably accounts for my rather over-complicated personal life. Interestingly, the researchers advise companies to capitalize on this rage by: “advertising anger-themed movies and video games next to healthy food aisles.” Talk about spreading the love.

Read More:Word Of Mouth, guardian.co.uk

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top