Diddy's Ex Kim Porter Responds to Nanny's Drug Claims, 'She's a Thief'

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ ex, Kim Porter wasted no time responding to shocking allegations she smoked marijuana and used cocaine around her twin daughters. The nanny made the allegations in a lawsuit which surfaced yesterday.

But Drago claims marijuana was not Kim’s only drug of choice. She alleges she found cocaine as well, and on one occasion she says she was driving the kids to school and noticed they were covered “in a white powdery substance.”

The former nanny went on to explain that the children managed to get into “a bag containing the powder, along with clear capsules, filled with another powdery substance in a bag in the back seat.”

The lawsuit paints an interesting picture of Porter who was previously known simply as the woman still in search of a commitment from the playboy all while bearing three children along the way. Porter who launched, Three Brown Girls in 2004 (an Ultra-Tainment firm aiming to fill a void in the entertainment, television, music and fashion sectors) in an attempt to build a name for herself outside of her famed ex is coming out swinging to clear her name.

A note posted on a fan page, Kim Porter Daily, read:

An attorney representing the nanny, Dawn Drago, quickly responded to Porter via TMZ:

“A rep from the law firm representing Drago tells TMZ, the shoplifting conviction is irrelevant “because she was not working at a shop.” That’s the quote. We don’t understand it either.”

Not surprisingly, Diddy has made no plans to remove his daughters from Porters care, which is a clear sign of support.

Do you believe that while the nanny may be bitter after losing her job that Porter is less than a saint around her children?

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top