Film Critic Roger Ebert Dies

The legendary movie critic, Roger Ebert, passed away today. He was 70 years old.

Ebert recently reported he’d be taking a “leave of presence” while receiving cancer treatment. As seen on Deadline.com, he also announced on his blog that he “must slow down.”

Despite thyroid cancer and subsequent complications, Ebert still managed to excel at his work. The critic wrote  movie reviews for a whopping 306 movies last year, calling it his “busiest year ever.” At times there could be as many as NINE movie reviews from the prolific critic in the Weekend section of the Sun-Times. Ebert wrote fifteen books over the course of his career. His most recent book, Life Itself, was  released in 2012. Ebert reportedly planned to write a follow up to this book about his own health challenges, sadly now will never get the chance.

Roger Ebert was described by Forbes magazine as “the most powerful pundit in America.” Ebert was also the first film critic to ever receive a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame and win a Pulitzer Prize.

The world of movie reviews won’t ever be the same without him. Two thumbs up for you Roger Ebert, may you rest in peace.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top