Roger Ebert Takes 'Leave Of Presence' After Cancer Returns

Roger Ebert announced cancer has returned to his body and he will be reducing his movie review workload while receiving treatment for his illness.

The 70-year-old has previously undergone surgery to illuminate cancer in his thyroid and salivary glands, which resulted in a lost of his ability to speak and eat.

Writing in his online journal, Ebert, who was hospitalized last year with a hip fracture, says his latest bout of cancer was discovered after a “painful fracture” that made it difficult for him to walk.

“The ‘painful fracture’ that made it difficult for me to walk has recently been revealed to be a cancer. It is being treated with radiation, which has made it impossible for me to attend as many movies as I used to.”

Roger Ebert described last year as his busiest, in which he wrote over 306 movie reviews, and now he’ll  need to take a ”leave of presence.”

He explained what this “leave of presence” entails, which would have him rely on other colleagues, like fellow Chicago Sun-Times critic Richard Roeper, to share the bulk of the review writing, leaving him to write only about those movies he’s interested in.

The Pulitzer Prize winner  says he also plans to spend time writing about his own health challenges.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top