Female friendships are notoriously intense. They can be as passionate as the most all-consuming love affair, as close as a family bond, as supportive as the best therapist, but as toxic as the worst poison.
Katie Couric’s talk show this week featured an episode on the life-sustaining power of female friendship. Ask a woman, including Couric herself, about her current best friend, her childhood friend turned adversary, or the friend that she lost touch with long ago, and you will stir up obvious and deep emotions. And, yes, you may even quickly get some tears. (Go on, ask Oprah about Gayle and see what happens.)
During the episode, Couric’s friendship expert, Shasta Nelson, described the five types of friendship that all women need to create a meaningful circle: contact, common, confirmed, community, and committed friends. These relationships exist on a continuum for women from the most casual friends to the deepest, most committed bonds.
My friend Stephanie and I have started a blogging project called HerStories: Tales of Friendship, and we’ve been asking women to share with us their stories about a friend who has shaped their lives. When we tell women, either in person or through email, they have responded passionately, even if they didn’t want to express their stories in writing. They can tell you in vivid detail about all the friendships that have changed their lives. And they don’t need much coaxing. I could be wrong, but I don’t think men would have quite the same visceral response to expressing all the ways that a friend has changed them.
As most men would likely agree, I think, male friendship is not the same. But are male friendships just different, or are they somehow inferior?
It’s not just many wives’ or girlfriends’ imaginations that their male partners are baffled by the high-maintenance nature of female friendship. There’s a reason for this, according to male friendship expert Geoffrey Greif and the research for his book, Buddy System: Understanding Male Friendship. Because men may perceive women’s relationships to be “needy,” they prefer relationships to be based on shared activity, rather than verbal or emotional expression. In short, men prefer to “do stuff” together. And women talk, cry, listen, and share more.
If friendships are based on a few important things — reciprocity, self-disclosure, and intimacy — men seem to have a little more trouble with the emotional intimacy and sharing that are critical to developing and sustaining friendships over time.
I’m often puzzled after my husband has phone conversations with his friends — or even goes away for an entire ski weekend — and then I press him about his friend’s relationship with his wife or girlfriend or about how his friend is coping with a new challenge. He’ll often say that what I perceive to be the most critical issue to talk about didn’t even come up in hours of prolonged conversation or during the course of an entire weekend.
My friend and blogging partner Stephanie described the gendered nature of friendship succinctly. She said, “When women get together with friends, it is to ‘plug in.’ We prefer connecting emotionally with one another. When men get together with friends, it is to ‘unplug.’ They enjoy each other’s companionship without necessarily plugging into one another’s feelings or lives.”
But all that intense intimacy and expression can prove to be too much. Women shouldn’t be so quick to judge the seeming lack of emotional depth in male friendships. Maybe they have the right idea after all.
Read more: Jessica Smock, RoleReboot