Venezuela to Investigate Possible Poisoning of Hugo Chavez

Venezuela will investigate whether or not late President Hugo Chavez was poisoned, according to acting President Nicolas Maduro. Chavez died while battling an undisclosed cancer in his pelvic region. Speaking on a regional TV network, Telesur, Maduro said that he believes Chavez was poisoned, echoing similar statements he made earlier this month accusing the United States of involvement in the late leader’s illness.

“We will seek the truth,” Maduro said. “We have the intuition that our commander Chavez was poisoned by dark forces that wanted him out of the way.”

Chavez first announced his battle with the disease in 2011, and made statements implicating the United States in his sickness.

The U.S. State Department dismissed Maduro’s most recent allegations as absurd, but there has been long-established bad blood between the two countries. On the day Chavez’s death was announced, Maduro ordered the deportation of two U.S. diplomats, accusing them of attempting to destabilize Venezuela.

Maduro will run for president on Chavez’s platform in a special election next month, and keeping the leader’s death in the minds of voters no doubt plays to his political advantage.

Though Chavez and his party already enjoyed widespread support among Venezuelans, a high level of emotion could carry Maduro to an easy victory during the April 14 polls. Opposition candidate Henrique Capriles will need to defeat the legacy of Chavez to sway the country in his favor.

“Let’s take the president (Chavez) away from the political debate out of respect for his memory, his family, his supporters,” Capriles’ campaign chief, Henri Falcon, said according to Reuters.

Prior to his death Chavez named Maduro, a former bus driver, his chosen successor. So far Maduro has yet to display the sort of bravado that made Chavez a beloved leader, something that Capriles will work to capitalize on.

Reuters reports that polls show Maduro with a 10 point lead over Capriles, who lost to Chavez by 11 points in last year’s election.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top