Bob Woodward Claims White House Threatened Him Over Sequester Reporting

In the escalating war of words between the White House and Bob Woodward, probably the best-known reporter in the country, Woodward is claiming that a senior White House official threatened him because of his reporting that claimed the sequester budget cuts that are about to slam the country was originally the idea of the president.

“It was said very clearly: ‘you will regret doing this,’ ” Woodward, an editor at the Washington Post and the bestselling author of many books about the White House, said on CNN’s The Situation Room. “I’m not going to say [who], a very senior person. It makes me very uncomfortable to have the White House telling reporters you’re going to regret doing something you believe in.”

Woodward wrote an op-ed in the Post over the weekend, saying the Obama administration invented the sequester and then moved “the goal posts” by saying any deal had to include new revenue along with the agreed-upon cuts.

But Democrats say that since the sequester was never meant to be implemented, it’s not moving the goal posts to try and replace it with spending cuts and additional revenue.

“I think if Barack Obama knew that was part of the communications strategy — let’s hope it’s not a strategy, but just a tactic he’s employing — he’d say, ‘look, we don’t go around trying to say to reporters if you in an honest way present something that we don’t like, you’re going to regret this,’ ” Woodward continued. “It’s Mickey Mouse.”

As for the “threat,” a senior White House official said, “Of course no threat was intended.”

“As Mr. Woodward noted, the email from the aide was sent to apologize for voices being raised in their previous conversation,” the official said. “The note suggested that Mr. Woodward would regret the observation he made regarding the sequester because that observation was inaccurate, nothing more. And Mr. Woodward responded to this aide’s email in a friendly manner.”

With an enviable access to the inner workings of many White House administrations, Woodward, who won a Pulitzer Prize with Carl Bernstein for stories that led to the Watergate scandal in the early 1970s, has crafted a reputation as the ultimate Washington insider, spinning tales in his bestselling books of the palace intrigue inside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. At the height of the 2012 election, Woodward published a book, “The Price of Politics,” suggesting that President Obama was in over his head in trying to deal with the economy — a book seized upon by the Republican opposition, and which may have made him a permanent enemy of the Obama White House.

Woodward went on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and said the president’s lack of leadership on the sequester was “madness.”

Woodward slammed Obama’s decision to announce that sequester cuts would force an American aircraft carrier to not deploy to the Persian Gulf.

“Can you imagine Ronald Reagan sitting there and saying ‘Oh, by the way, I can’t do this because of some budget document’?” Woodward asked, referring to Obama’s comment about the aircraft carrier. “Or George W. Bush saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to invade Iraq because I can’t get the aircraft carriers I need.’ Or even Bill Clinton saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to attack Saddam Hussein’s intelligence headquarters,’ … because of some budget document?”

“Under the Constitution, the president is commander-in-chief and employs the force. And so we now have the president going out because of this piece of paper and this agreement, ‘I can’t do what I need to do to protect the country,’ ” Woodward concluded. “That’s a kind of madness that I haven’t seen in a long time.”

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top