‘The Amazing Spider-Man 2’ Costume Redesign Unveiled Plus New Set Photos Follow.

Promotion for the sequel to Sony Pictures’ The Amazing Spider-Man seems to be ramping up while filming for the comic book movie continues in New York.

Just yesterday the studio released an official image portraying the redesigned Spider-Man costume. To the delight of fanboys, the redesign appears to draw more from the traditional suit featured in the Stan Lee and Steve Ditko’s comic book creation.

Gone are the stylized “belt” line, sneaker boots, gloves, reflective eye shades in the mask and the basketball-texture. A smoother suit with big white eyes, a more pronounced insignia, and boots that blend seamlessly are among the most obvious changes made.

On the other hand, the blurry, unofficial set photos are not as much of a thrill. No new information can be drawn from them, other than a head to toe shot of the new Spider-man suit and a first look at Shailene Woodley with red hair as the rebooted Mary Jane Watson.

Unlike previous takes on the friendly neighborhood superhero, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 is filming in New York, the original home of Peter Parker. There seems to be a theme of staying closer to the comic book material for this installment.

Besides Woodley’s Mary Jane, the upcoming sequel will reportedly see the introduction of Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan), Rhino ( Paul Giamatti), and Electro (Jamie Foxx). It’s unclear what roles newcomers Felicity Jones and Colm Feore will play. It has also been reported that the storyline will set up a third film to round out a trilogy.

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 hits theaters on May 2, 2014. Check out the leaked production photos on the next page and let us know what you think about them…

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top