Jet Magazine Responds To Fantasia’s Cover Complaints

JET Magazine has already responded to Fantasia’s angry Instagram post that scolded them for using an old photo of her for the cover when she had already sent them new ones.

The magazine’s response was simple: they just didn’t like the photos… and neither do we.

Fantasia was fortunate enough to be brought out of the depths of irrelevancy by JET Magazine who placed her on the cover March 2013 issue, but as they say no good deed goes unpunished.

Fantasia lashed out at JET for using an old photo of her and deciding not to use any of the three photos she had already sent them specifically for the cover.

If I was the editor in chief of JET I would have responded with a photo of me pointing and laughing at the photos she sent in or perhaps even a survey of how many people thought the pictures were just strange and gaudy for no apparent reason.

Instead the magazine’s editor in chief, Mitzi Miller, responded with a very kind statement that explained why they chose not to use the photos she sent.

“JET magazine is honored to have Fantasia grace the cover of its March issue,” Miller responded. “It is unfortunate that Fantasia is displeased with the cover selection, however JET stands by its decision. As standard editorial practice, JET consulted with Fantasia’s team, but reserves the right to select the image we deem as most appropriate for JET’s brand and reflective of the cover story sentiment. JET continues to root for Fantasia’s success and encourages her fans to pick up the new issue.”

At the end of the day, JET did the powerhouse songstress a huge favor in more ways than one.

First things first, let’s be honest, with so many African American females shining at their brightest and reaching new heights in their careers JET certainly didn’t have to extend the cover offer to Fantasia. It could have easily been Alicia Keys, Nicki Minaj, or Kerry Washington on the cover, but they chose her instead.

Secondly, the photos that Fantasia and her team submitted were just down right awful, but apparently she didn’t see that.

“This saddens Me!!! It is clear that this picture is 10 Years Old and JET Magazine puts it on the Cover!! After I send them the NEW LOOK AND DIRECTION. . SAD!!! I WANT A PUBLIC APOLOGY FROM JET,” the powerhouse vocalist posted on Instagram.

Really? No seriously… really Fantasia? The picture is too old of a photo of you?

Well that certainly seems like an injustice considering how much your appearance has changed over the years. Yes… everything about you is different now that you added that tired Cleopatra wig to the equation.

The major different between the photos are that the one JET used made her look like a classy, matured artist. The ones she wanted them to use made her look like an Egyptian drag queen.

…And what’s up with the pose of her sniffing her fingernails? Or the one with an annoying glare on the side of the photo? Most teenagers’ Facebook photos that they take in a dirty bathroom mirror are of better quality than the submitted photos.

With all due respect Mrs. Barrino, you owe JET Magazine a huge thank you for doing their best to keep those photos out of the public eye.

 

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top