Lawmaker Lautenberg Suggests Mayor Cory Booker Needs ‘Spanking’

Aging Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), had some harsh words for Cory Booker Tuesday, suggesting that he won’t be handing his Senate seat over to the Newark mayor before the time comes. Speaking to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Lautenberg, who turned 89 Wednesday, suggested that Booker was a child in need of a spanking. Booker recently announced that he intends to run for Lautenberg’s position in the 2014 elections, but Lautenberg has not confirmed or denied a re-election campaign.

Instead, the elder lawmaker has expressed his desire to focus on his job in Washington, rather than politics and retirement. Booker has not pushed the issue, but told CNN’s Starting Point that Lautenberg has “a decision to make.” Booker’s early campaign announcement and statements regarding the senator have been deemed “disrespectful” and “self-absorbed” by Lautenberg’s aides.

“I have four children, I love each one of them. I can’t tell you that one of them wasn’t occasionally disrespectful, so I gave them a spanking and everything was OK,” Lautenberg told Inquirer correspondent Jonathan Tamari when asked about his office’s characterization of Booker.

“I’ve got a lot of work to do yet, serious things and we pride ourselves (in) my office and my team (on) getting things done. That’s the focus. I’m not thinking about the politics right now,” he added.

Lautenberg would not confirm his position in the 2014 election, but did suggest that Booker could have competition in the race. “I’m sure he won’t be a lone soldier out there drooling at the mouth and wanting this cushy job we have here,” the senator said.

Another six-year term could prove taxing for Lautenberg. He recently missed several weeks in Washington due to sickness, missing Senate votes on the fiscal cliff plan and superstorm Sandy relief legislation.

 

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top