FCC Eyes Prison Pay-Phone Rules to Protect Inmates

A set of rules proposed by the Federal Communications Commission could lower pay-phone rates for prisoners who are subject to extreme fees while trying to keep in touch with family. Changes in the policy have been on the FCC docket for years, but last month the agency made the proposed changes official. Inmates can be charged more than a dollar a minute — high charges for their families should they remain in consistent contact. The FCC would install rate caps and remove per-call charges.

“This is not just an issue of markets and rates; it is a broader issue of social justice,” Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel wrote in a statement on the FCC website. “When a single phone call may cost as much as a month of unlimited phone service, the financial burden of staying in touch may be too much for inmates’ families to bear.”

Advocates for prisoners’ rights have pushed for changes to pay-phone regulations for a decade, a movement that began when Martha Wright filed a petition with the FCC after being charged $18 for a five-minute phone call to her incarcerated grandson. Massachusetts think tank Prison Policy Initiative reports that a 15-minute call from a Georgia prison costs more than $17. The group cited a lack of regulations across many states.

Multiple studies tie an inmates’ relationship with their family to their ability to avoid repeat offenses and re-incarceration. Call affordability directly impacts a prisoner’s ability to maintain those relationships. The FCC has the power to impose interstate regulations that would force the phone companies responsible for prison phone lines to keep prices affordable.

“Families who want to stay connected to their loved ones spend as much as the cost of a new iPhone every month,” Deborah Golden of the D.C. Prisoners’ Project told the Los Angeles Times. “It just reached a point where the FCC had to act.”

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top