Cuba Holds Its Breath Waiting For News of Hugo Chavez

Castro and Chavez

The first day of January usually begins with loudspeakers blaring, blasting songs and slogans. On the anniversary of the Cuban Revolution the government organizes activities and parties to energize the enthusiasm the date already provokes. However, this year no attempt to commemorate the date is being made. The morning dawned quietly, calmly, in silence. Many speculate that such austerity is motivated by the serious state of health of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. He was operated on in Cuba in early December and his current situation is surrounded by great secrecy.

But Cubans have learned to read information even where there is none. Such a complete lack of celebration around the most important government anniversary has set off the alarms. There are those who say the mourning is due to the premonition of an economic collapse, if it comes to pass that Chavez is gone. And others predict that the tenant of Miraflores Palace will not return to his country alive, given the sequence of postoperative complications he has suffered. Beyond the speculations, the fact is that Cuba in 2013 would be very different in the absence of its principal economic mentor.

Read more: Huffingtonpost.com

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top