Samuel L. Jackson Argues With Anne Hathaway In Epic "Sad Off"

Samuel L. Jackson and Anne Hathaway recently came together to combine their star power to promote their respective movies Django Unchained and Les Miserables.  Funny or Die has brought the pair together for the sake of the holidays season to remind us what this time of year is all about, but something goes terribly wrong.

The two break out into an epic Christmas “Sad Off” argument.

Hathaway waste no time inciting the confrontation declaring that her film is “literally called the miserable.” Subsequently, Jackson gave her a scolding look. Hathaway quickly steps back saying, “Ok, I guess your movie is kinda dark too. Interesting choice of word.” Jackson replied.

These two are obviously biased about their movies and audiences won’t know which movie is the saddest until both films come out on Christmas day. In the meantime, watch Jackson and Hathaway hash it out in the video below to see who won this “Sad Off.”

 

 

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top