'Ted' Tops 'Hangover' Grossing $500 Million Worldwide…

Who thought that the success of the Hangover could ever be matched or in this case, surpassed. Moviegoers are proving exactly what researchers claim: In the event of hard times, people seek to laugh to get their minds off of their everyday problems. With the economy being so bad the last few years, it obviously doesn’t have an effect on people opting to pay for a good laugh at the theaters. Hangover, Hangover II, Bridesmaids, Due Date, Horrible Bosses, and now Ted are all comedies that have proving to make hundreds of millions in the theaters during hard times.

Seth MacFarlane’s Ted has become Universal’s highest grossing film of 2012. The studio announced Yesterday that MacFarlane’s film has crossed $500 million at the worldwide box office to become the highest grossing original R-rated comedy of all time. The milestone beat Hangover’s $467.4 million earned globally.

Hangover II still is the number one R-rated comedy of all time, which made $581.5 million worldwide. Ted has grossed $218.7 in USA and $281.4 internationally, totaling a little over $500 million.

Ted stars Mark Wahlberg, Mila Kunis and MacFarlane, who voices the role of the naughty teddy bear.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top