Cher, Kathy Griffin Release Anti-Romney PSA

Cher and Kathy Griffin have joined forces for an Anti-Romney PSA, titled  “Don’t Let Mitt Turn Back Time on Women’s Rights.” In the PSA, the iconic diva and comedienne take jabs at a host of Republican leaders, namely GOP Presidential nominee Mitt Romney.

Alluding to Cher’s 1989 hit, Griffin argues, “Romney and his buddies are trying to turn back time on women’s rights.” The pair specifically criticizes Romney for his support of Richard Mourdock, the U.S. Senate candidate who suggested pregnancies resulting from rape were part of God’s plan.

Cher also denounces Vice Presidential nominee Paul Ryan, “that guy who looks like Dracula,” for distinguishing between “forcible” and “non-forcible” rape. The diva quips, “I didn’t know there was such a thing as non-forcible rape.”

The video directly addresses viewers in the swing states of Florida, Ohio and Wisconsin, as Obama supporters try to close the gaps in those areas before Tuesday’s election.

Along with the political commentary, the Anti-Romney PSA does offer comedienne Griffin prime opportunity to practice her Cher material, including a few snarky puns, most notably calling Republicans a bunch of “gypsies, tramps and thieves.”

The PSA was a partnership with Actually.org, an organization that promotes truthful political discussion through humor. Actually.org has previously produced other Anti-Romney PSAs featuring Sarah Silverman and Rosie Perez.

As Election Day approaches, celebrities are reiterating their support of President Obama. On Sunday Night, Obama’s YouTube channel released a short video of Will Ferrell urging voters to vote.

Ferrell, dressed in a smoking jacket, states “vote Obama, it’s a slam-dunk” after promising Americans he would do anything to make them vote—including giving them a free tattoo or making them dinner.

Read the rest of this story on Popular Critic

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top