Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Entertainment
Entertainment

Beyoncé and Jay-Z Denied Trademark to Blue Ivy

Posted byBy ABS Contributor | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

Beyoncé and Jay-Z have been denied the right to trademark Blue Ivy.

The superstar couple filed a petition in January, days after their baby was born, to trademark her name. Apparently, the couple was trying to trademark the name so they could use it for a line of baby products. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the application meaning the name is open to be used by the couple as well as a wedding planner that has been trying to trademark the name way before the baby existed.

Veronica Alexandra, a Boston-based wedding planner filed an application to trademark Blue Ivy back in 2009, two years before Bey and Jay’s daughter was born. “I knew this was going to be a bittersweet roller coaster,” Alexandra said to Rolling Stone. “If this wasn’t going to work, I’d go after both of them. Like, ‘Let’s do it!’ In my mind I had some protective rights. There’s no way by way of being a celebrity they should have entitlement [to the name]. Shame on them.” Alexandra wanted to trademark the name so she could use it for wedding and event planning and marketing related to her business.

Alexandra was shocked when she learned the Carters gave their daughter the same name as her company. “I was really blatantly shocked,” she continued. “I didn’t think it was true because nobody names their daughter Blue Ivy.” According to Rolling Stone, she named her company Blue Ivy because the name conveyed romantic traditionalism. Ultimately, Alexandra is a good sport about the situation. “For me it was a very large compliment,” she says. “All in all I was extremely happy that my design capacity is pretty bad ass. Money doesn’t buy everything.”

There has been no word from Beyoncé and Jay-Z on the matter and it isn’t clear whether or not they plan to appeal.

Still independent.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top