Government Sues Wells Fargo For Decade Of Reckless Home Loans

The U.S. government is suing Wells Fargo over claims that the bank made reckless home mortgage loans for a decade.

In a lawsuit filed Tuesday in Manhattan’s Southern District of New York, the government accused Wells Fargo of “reckless underwriting” and fraudulently approving thousands of home loans that caused large-scale losses for the government.

The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) paid out millions of dollars in insurance claims on defaulted loans that were falsely certified by Wells Fargo, according to the complaint.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said Wells Fargo’s “intentional concealment” of bad loan information on some 6,320 risky loans caused the federal government to pay out $190 million on claims for defaulted home mortgages. The loans were made between 2002 and 2010.

Many of those risky loans were to Latino and African-American clients, who were much more often directed towards more expensive subprime mortgages that they couldn’t afford.

Wells Fargo kept its defective loans secret from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the complaint said. From January 2002 to December 2010, the bank internally identified more than 6,000 “materially deficient” loans, including 3,000 that had defaulted in the first six months, but did not comply with its self-reporting obligations, the complaint said.

Prior to October 2005, the bank did not self-report a single bad loan, and the inadequate reporting continued even after a HUD inquiry that year, the suit states. All told, from 2002 through 2010 the bank self-reported only 238 loans, according to the complaint.

The lawsuit also suggests that Wells Fargo rewarded employees for getting large numbers of loans approved, which contributed to the fraud.

“Quality repeatedly took a back seat to quantity,” Bharara said in a statement.

The complaint said the “extremely poor quality of Wells Fargo’s loans was a function of management’s nearly singular focus on increasing the volume of FHA originations – and the bank’s profits – rather than on the quality of the loans.” The bank made the violations worse by “hiring temporary staff to churn out” those loans.

In a statement, Wells Fargo denied the allegations. “The bank will present facts to vigorously defend itself against this action,” it said.

The government is seeking unspecified damages and civil penalties.

The case is a joint effort by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, as well as the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and HUD’s Office of Inspector General.

The group has filed other civil fraud lawsuits claiming reckless mortgage lending against four other banks, three of which were settled.

In February, Citigroup agreed to pay $158 million to resolve charges that its mortgage unit defrauded the FHA.

In May, Deutsche Bank (DB) also agreed to pay $202 million to settle civil claims that its mortgage unit lied to qualify thousands of risky mortgages for the same FHA insurance program.

 

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top