Wells Fargo Accused of Targeting Blacks with Bad Loans

In the years since the collapse of the housing market, allegations of racial impropriety by America’s largest banks continue to surface. The latest claims come from Beth Jacobson, a former Wells Fargo loan officer who alleges that the company influenced black borrowers into overly expensive subprime loans at the peak of the housing bubble.

As the Washington Post reports, Jacobson explained the well planned actions of loan officers, who would move into areas with a high African-American population and involve themselves with local churches and community groups, all in an effort to sell poorly structured mortgages. Jacobson’s account of these practices is the first aimed at a major bank. A study conducted by the Federal Reserve in 2009 found that 55 percent of black home buyers were led toward subprime mortgages, compared to just 17 percent of white homebuyers. This startling statistic is hard to write off as coincidence.

Jacobson’s testimony will be used in one of four major court actions filed against Wells Fargo so far, all dealing with the practices of the bank’s loan officers. The Federal Reserve filed civil charges against the bank, accusing Wells Fargo of pushing minorities into subprime contracts, but the case was settled last year when the bank paid $85 million to the Reserve without an admission of wrongdoing.

Last December, a former vice president at JP Morgan told the New York Times that account executives for the company had specifically targeted vulnerable customers with limited knowledge of the mortgage process, and even limited fluency in English, and urged them into subprime contracts. Of course, a large number of these borrowers were minorities.

When the bubble finally did burst, it was those same minorities who paid the price, as blacks and Latinos were 70 percent more likely to have their homes foreclosed.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top