Ben Affleck to Replace Ryan Gosling in 'Focus'

A recent report from The Playlist claims the upcoming film Focus has dropped the starring duo of Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone, and picked up the actor/director Ben Affleck – if the right female lead can be found.

The film would have marked the third film featuring Gosling and Stone, following in the footsteps of last year’s Crazy, Stupid, Love., and the upcoming crime drama Gangster Squad. However, the film will reunite Love’s writer/director John Requa with Glenn Ficarra, a team which brought audiences the likes of Bad Santa and Crazy, Stupid, Love.

Focus will feature Affleck (potentially) as a lifelong conman who becomes romantically involved with an apprentice, resulting in relationship problems. They meet again after a period of time, resulting in a hilarious playing out of long term effects.

Ben Affleck’s experience in romantic comedies knows no limits. He built his career off the likes of movies such as Chasing Amy, Armageddon, and Jersey Girl, after all. It’ll be somewhat interesting to see what sort of performance he’ll be able to produce after being behind the camera and making action flicks for so long. Will it be another Gigli, or another Pearl Harbor (assuming there is a difference in quality between the two)? The answer that question more than likely involves who will be chosen to star alongside Affleck.

Seeing as Focus is still in its pre-production phase, there is sure to be more information regarding Focus as more casting choices are made. Be sure to check back for more information.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top