U.S. Payroll Count: More Jobs Created Than Lost Under Pres. Obama

More jobs have now been created than lost since President Barack Obama took office, preliminary revisions to the U.S. payroll count showed.

The number of jobs created in the year ended in March was revised upward by 386,000, the Labor Department said in Washington yesterday. If that estimate is confirmed in the final report, it would wipe out the 261,000 employment deficit spanning January 2009 to last month that is currently on the books and mean the U.S. has created a net 125,000 jobs since Obama was inaugurated.

At the same time, the 8.1 percent unemployment rate in August was higher than the 7.8 percent when Obama took the oath of office. Joblessness has exceeded 8 percent for 43 consecutive months, the longest stretch in monthly records dating to back 1948.

“The jobs recovery over the last 2.5 years has been a bit stronger than initially reported, although much work remains to be done to return to full employment,” Alan Krueger, chairman of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers, said in a statement.

The figures won’t become official until the final update is issued with the January employment data released in February 2013, three months after the presidential election.

Republican challenger Mitt Romney’s campaign responded to the revisions by turning the focus back on the jobless rate, saying the president has fallen short of his own economic advisers’ 2009 estimates of how much unemployment would decline…

Read more: Bloomberg Businessweek

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top