Stay Connected
Atlanta Black Star/Film
FilmNews

Uproar about Daniel Day Lewis' Take On Lincoln's Voice

Posted byBy Joe Cohen | Published on: CommentsComments (0)

Since the trailer for Steven Spielburg’s Lincoln hit the internet yesterday, Critics have been hammering lead actor Daniel Day Lewis for his channeled Abraham Lincoln voice.

According to Harold Holzer, a Lincoln historian, “Lincoln’s voice, as far as period descriptions go, was a little shriller, a little higher.”

“He often was so nervous at the beginning, he would almost shift up into a falsetto before he settled himself said Ronald C. White Jr., author of a Lincoln: A Biography.

Giving the facts from Lincoln experts, Lewis’ voice is very close if not completely accurate. Evidently, attention to details and historical facts aren’t good enough for some.

“I still don’t like the sound of Daniel Day Lewis’ Lincoln voice,” Said Hollywood blogger Jeffrey Wells. “I almost hate it, in a way. It’s flat, indistinctive, and unimpressive, It’s hard to describe what I was looking to hear, but this isn’t it. And I dearly love the voices that Lewis has given us over the years. Wells adds, “It just doesn’t sound right. Lewis’ Lincoln sounds like … I don’t know but maybe like a freshman U.S. Senator from Ohio or something.”

If you haven’t seen the trailer you can see it right here. When you first hear his voice you may believe it belongs to someone else, but when the voice finally match the face, it is a little weird.

Lincoln is scheduled for a November 9th release.

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Give once Give monthly Support another way

Related Stories

Back to top