James Worthy ‘Not A Fan’ of Dwight Howard

If Dwight Howard thought it was going to be all love in Los Angeles, Hall of Famer Lakers forward James Worthy let him know that’s not necessarily the case.

Worthy, who is one of the beloved Laker legends, did not hold back in his issues with the team’s new starting center.

“I wasn’t a fan of Dwight Howard,” Worthy said during a conference call to announce his new role as main studio analyst for Lakers  games on Time Warner Cable  SportsNet. Worthy said all the back-and-forth with Howard with the Magic last year — the whining and complaining and requesting coach Stan Van Gundy be fired — did not settle well with him.

Simply, Worthy is “old school,” meaning nothing should distract you from playing the game. He did not like that with Howard, “there was too much conversation.”

“Who said this, I don’t like this coach. To me, that’s nonsense,” Worthy said. “Your job is to come in and play and deal with the situation that’s there.”

That’s the way Worthy did it. He played and played hard, no matter the circumstances. Old school.

Worthy also was deeply disappointed and downright angry that Howard was hesitant about joining the Lakers, one of the leagues’ storied franchises. “I was a little bit taken back (by that),” Worthy said. “I think I heard him say. . . if the Lakers drafted him, he wouldn’t take it. I knew that was gibberish.”

Worthy, however, made it clear that now that Howard is on the Lakers, he welcomes him to the team. He just thinks that the superstar with a larger-than-life personality needs a minor attitude adjustment. In L.A., stars abound, and Howard will be the biggest one in physical size, but not in prominence. Getting used to that might be an issue for him.

“This is not Orlando,” Worthy  said.

Independent journalism still matters.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

The wider picture isn't any steadier. Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under, it's rarely the ones built to center a Black perspective from the ground up that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top