Book on Bin Laden Killing by Navy SEAL Contradicts U.S. Account

WASHINGTON — A new firsthand account of the Navy SEALs raid that killed Osama bin Ladenin Pakistan last year contradicts the Obama administration’s previous descriptions of the mission, raising questions about whether the leader of Al Qaeda posed a clear threat to the commandos who fired on him.

The book written by a member of the Navy SEALs under an assumed name describes Osama bin Laden’s killing.
According to the account in the book, “No Easy Day,” which will go on sale next week under the pseudonym Mark Owen, Bin Laden was shot in the head when he peered out of his bedroom door into a top-floor hallway of his compound as the SEALs rushed up a narrow stairwell toward him.

The author, whom military officials have identified as Matt Bissonnette, 36, said he was directly behind the “point man,” or lead commando, as the SEALs followed Bin Laden into the bedroom, where they found him collapsed on the floor at the foot of his bed with “blood and brains spilled out of the side of his skull,” and two women wailing over his body that was “still twitching and convulsing.”

The author said he and another member then trained their weapons on Bin Laden’s chest and fired several rounds, until he was motionless. The SEALs later found two unloaded weapons — an AK-47 rifle and a Makarov pistol — near the bedroom door.

In the administration’s version of events after the raid, the lead commando’s shot in the stairwell missed, and the SEALs confronted Bin Laden in the bedroom, killing him with one shot to the chest and another above the left eye.

The new book’s account offers a more inglorious ending — both for Bin Laden and for the SEALs — and, if true, raises the question of whether Bin Laden posed a clear threat to the commandos in his death throes.

Military officials have said that the SEALs made split-second decisions, fearing that Bin Laden, even though unarmed, could have exploded a suicide vest or other booby trap.

The Pentagon and the White House declined to comment on the new account, reflecting at least in part the administration’s reluctance to reopen an issue at a time when Republicans have accused the administration of exploiting the raid’s success to burnish President Obama’s national security credentials during his re-election campaign.

“We’re not going to confirm or deny his account,” said Lt. Col. James Gregory, a Defense Department spokesman. Colonel Gregory said the department was still weighing disciplinary or legal action against the author.

Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the National Security Council, also declined to comment, saying, “As President Obama said on the night that justice was brought to Osama bin Laden, ‘We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism and unparalleled courage of those who serve our country.’ ”

Elsewhere in the book, the author states that members of the SEALs unit were not “huge fans of Obama,” although they respected the commander in chief for authorizing the operation. “We just got this guy re-elected,” the author quotes another member of the unit, identified by the pseudonym Walt, as saying.

The Associated Press and The Huffington Post reported the new account of Bin Laden’s death on Wednesday after purchasing copies of the book. The New York Times obtained a copy later on Wednesday.

Source: New York Times

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top