Electronic Cigarettes Are Not Linked to Heart Disease

Using electronic cigarettes is not associated with acute adverse effects on cardiac function, researchers from the Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece, reported at the European Society for Cardiology 2012 Conference in Munich, Germany. Dr Konstantinos Farsalinos added that according to currently available data, electronic cigarettes are considerably less harmful than smoking tobacco, and switching from smoking tobacco to using electronic cigarettes is most likely a good health move.

According to the World Health Organization WHO), smoking will have caused over 1 billion deaths by the end of this century. It is the most preventable risk factor for lung and cardiac disease. Electronic cigarette manufacturers and sellers have been promoting the product as a safer alternative for regular smokers. Millions of people worldwide regularly use electronic cigarettes today.

An electronic cigarette mimics the sensations and actions experienced by tobacco smoking, but instead of breathing in smoke, the user inhales vapor. The device contains a cartridge filled with liquid, a heating element to evaporate the liquid, and a battery.

Previous studies have shown that electronic cigarettes contain fewer toxins than tobacco cigarettes. The majority of studies have not detected nitrosamines in electronic cigarettes. (tobacco-specific) Nitrosamines form part of an important group of carcinogens in tobacco products. The few that did detect nitrosamines in the devices reported levels 500 to 1,400 less than what most cigarettes contain. In order to breathe in the nitrosamines contained in one tobacco cigarette, an electronic cigarette user would need to use his/her device every day for 4 to 12 months.

Read more: Medical News Today

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top