Study: Entrepreneurs Are Happier

Wharton MBAs who became entrepreneurs can be considered “significantly happier” than most other MBAs, if you don’t control for how much money they made, says Ethan Mollick, who is researching that and other issues along with fellow Wharton management professor Matthew Bidwell . “Two things tend to make people happy — money and age,” says Mollick. “The more money someone earns, and the older they are, the happier they are in general, which was also borne out” in the study, based on nearly 11,000 Wharton MBAs who responded to the survey sent to 30,000 graduates since 1990.

The other group of “happiest” MBAs were those who worked for non-profits, the government and educational organizations, says Mollick. They were as happy as the entrepreneurs when researchers did not control for income. When they did control for income, the entrepreneurs were happier than the non-profit/government group. “Dollar for dollar, that means if they were paid the same, then the non-profit, government and education” work is in the same upper category of happiness as the entrepreneurs.

Mollick suggests these groups are happier because they experience a better work/family balance and more job satisfaction. And even though entrepreneurs may “work more hours, they have control — more choices, though that is speculation.” There are “real benefits to being your own boss.”

In the survey, “we find not many become entrepreneurs right after business school, but somewhere above 20% have a stint as an entrepreneur at some point in their careers, even if they were not expecting it,” Mollick adds.

Source: Knowledge@Wharton

Democracy needs journalism it can trust.

This election season, the stakes are higher than usual — and so is the pressure on newsrooms to soften their coverage, stay quiet, or just disappear. Independent reporting, the kind that answers to readers instead of advertisers or political pressure, matters more in a moment like this, not less.

For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed independent and reader-funded. We have no corporate owner and no shareholders telling us what to cover or how to cover it. That independence is also our biggest vulnerability: nothing protects it except readers choosing to fund it directly.

Newspaper ad revenue has fallen more than 80% since 2005, and local newsrooms are closing at a rate of roughly two a week nationwide. When outlets go under in a moment like this, it's rarely the independent, reader-funded ones that get to stick around.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top