Vanessa Bryant Trashes Media For Gold Digger Label

Kobe Bryant’s wife Vanessa Bryant set off a media firestorm when New York Daily News released portions of her interview that quickly reaffirmed for many that she’s a gold digger. The paragraph that caused a hail of criticism to descend on the 30-year old when something like this;

“I certainly would not want to be married to somebody that can’t win championships. If you’re sacrificing time away from my family and myself for the benefit of winning championships, then winning a championship should happen every single year.’

It’s easy to see how Vanessa’s comment could be “misconstrued” so she released a statement to clarify,

I’m sad to hear that comments in my New York  Magazine interview are being misconstrued and taken out of context. I have and will continue to support my husband’s dreams. I have been with Kobe for 13 years. I accepted his marriage proposal PRIOR to him winning any of his 5 championships with his teammates.

For anyone to think otherwise is wrong. It is not about being married to a ‘winner’ it is about our sacrifice as a family.

Several months ago Vanessa was under scrutiny again when she filed for divorce from Kobe soon after their 10th year anniversary. Reportedly Kobe’s wife was advised by her mother to wait to maximize her payout. The gold digger comments were relentless but Kobe obviously knows something the public doesn’t and pleaded to reconcile with his estranged wife. As of right now the Bryants are on their way to reconciling albeit with Vanessa now owning the deed to three of Kobe’s mansions. 🙂

Independent journalism doesn't fund itself.

We hope this story was worth your time. For over 14 years, Atlanta Black Star has stayed Black-owned and independently run. We didn't get here by waiting on ad budgets that were never built to prioritize us. Our readers did that.

Corporate support for Black media has always been thin. Outlets like ours get roughly 1% of the $170 billion spent on U.S. advertising each year, and that margin is shrinking further as advertisers walk back the DEI-linked commitments they made in 2020. That's the backdrop. It's not why we're asking.

We know a request for support isn't why you came here. But without readers choosing to fund this work directly, the depth of reporting we can do at home and abroad shrinks along with everyone else's. If you're not in a position to give, that doesn't change how much we value you as a reader.

If you are able to, a recurring contribution does more for us than a single one-time gift, because it lets us plan the next investigation instead of just the next invoice. It takes about 30 seconds, no long form, no account. Thank you for continuing to support independent journalism and freedom of the press.

Back to top